If freedom of speech is absolute, how come it's not applied for private spaces and for the Internet?
09.06.2025 00:30

Revealing classified information
Fraud
Insurrection
That’s what it is. You have no right to use other people’s stuff. If people let you use their stuff, they can tell you how you can use it, and they can tell you to stop using it any time they want.
No freedom is absolute.
If you’re wondering why free speech doesn’t apply to the internet, it’s because you have no right to use other people’s stuff for free.
When British people write X after everything, are they being serious or trying not to be awkward?
Terroristic threats
You have freedom of speech. If I loan you my computer, I can tell you not to use it for certain things, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.
You have freedom to travel. If I loan you my car, I can tell you not to take it out of town, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.
Trade secrets
Revenge porn
False advertising
Some men love anal sex more than vaginal sex. Why?
Freedom of speech does not apply to:
Child pornography
Insider trading
Threats of violence
Perjury
And much, much more.
John Brenkus, host of Emmy-winning ‘Sport Science’ on ESPN, died by suicide - New York Post
HIPAA violations
Conspiracy